S & S Hotel Ventures Limited Partnership v. 777 S. H. Corp. S & S Hotel Ventures Limited Partnership v. 777 S. H. Corp.

S & S Hotel Ventures Limited Partnership v. 777 S. H. Corp‪.‬

NY.45453; 508 N.E.2d 647; 69 N.Y.2d 437 (1987)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

[69 N.Y.2d 437 Page 440] Opinion OF THE COURT The advocate-witness disqualification rules contained in the Code of Professional Responsibility provide guidance, not binding authority, for courts in determining whether a party's law firm, at its adversary's instance, should be disqualified during litigation. Courts must, in addition, consider such factors as the party's valued right to choose its own counsel, and the fairness and effect in the particular factual setting of granting disqualification or continuing representation. Concluding that the court below failed to exercise any discretion, and that disqualification was not required by the circumstances presented, we reverse the Appellate Division order and deny defendant's motion.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1987
30 April
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
12
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
71.5
KB

More Books by Court of Appeals of New York

Incorporated Village Nyack v. Daytop Village Incorporated Village Nyack v. Daytop Village
1991
Roberta Rinaldo Et Al. v. Arthur Mcgovern Roberta Rinaldo Et Al. v. Arthur Mcgovern
1991
People State New York v. Timothy B. Cooper People State New York v. Timothy B. Cooper
1991
Gerard A. Dolan v. Lois A. Dolan Gerard A. Dolan v. Lois A. Dolan
1991
Matter Allstate Insurance Company v. Eric Killakey Matter Allstate Insurance Company v. Eric Killakey
1991
Matter Istim v. Chemical Bank Matter Istim v. Chemical Bank
1991