Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Mv Transportation Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Mv Transportation

Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Mv Transportation

115 P.3D 460, 36 CAL.4TH 643, 31 CAL.RPTR.3D 147, 2005 DAILY JOURNAL D.A.R. 8863, 05 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 6495, 2005.CA.0006579

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

May a commercial general liability (CGL) insurer obtain reimbursement of its expenses of defending its insured against a third party lawsuit, when it is ultimately determined, as a matter of law, that the policy never afforded any potential for coverage, and that a duty to defend thus never arose? Where, as here, the insurer properly reserved its right to such reimbursement, we conclude that the answer is "yes."

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2005
25 July
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
26
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
84.6
KB

More Books by Colorado Supreme Court

People v. Newman People v. Newman
1996
People v. Rotenberg People v. Rotenberg
1996
People v. Murray People v. Murray
1996
Padilla v. School Dist. No. 1 in the City and County of Denver Padilla v. School Dist. No. 1 in the City and County of Denver
2001
In re J.P. Meyer Trucking and Construction In re J.P. Meyer Trucking and Construction
2001
People v. Doherty People v. Doherty
1996