Functional Requirements for Secure Code: The Reference Monitor and Use Case. Functional Requirements for Secure Code: The Reference Monitor and Use Case.

Functional Requirements for Secure Code: The Reference Monitor and Use Case‪.‬

Academy of Information and Management Sciences Journal 2009, Jan-July, 12, 1-2

    • 79,00 Kč
    • 79,00 Kč

Publisher Description

INTRODUCTION Failure to incorporate security into systems requirements is a concern dating back at least a quarter of a century (Schell, Downey & Popek, 1973, Pipkin, 2000). Compounding this oversight is the lack of attention paid to security in textbooks and the exclusion of security as a functional requirement (Haworth, 2002, Trimmer, Parker & Schou, 2007).

GENRE
Computing & Internet
RELEASED
2009
1 January
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
8
Pages
PUBLISHER
The DreamCatchers Group, LLC
SIZE
270.5
KB

More Books by Academy of Information and Management Sciences Journal

Students' Perception of Effectiveness Using Different Methodologies of Teaching Advanced Business Statistics. Students' Perception of Effectiveness Using Different Methodologies of Teaching Advanced Business Statistics.
1999
E-Commerce Security Standards and Loopholes (Manuscripts) E-Commerce Security Standards and Loopholes (Manuscripts)
2000
Customer Relationship Management Strategies for the Internet (Company Overview) Customer Relationship Management Strategies for the Internet (Company Overview)
2001
Toward an Understanding of MIS Survey Research Methodology: Current Practices, Trends, And Implications for Future Research (Manuscripts) Toward an Understanding of MIS Survey Research Methodology: Current Practices, Trends, And Implications for Future Research (Manuscripts)
2003
Production & Operations Quality Concepts: Deficient Diffusion Into the Service Sector (Manuscripts) Production & Operations Quality Concepts: Deficient Diffusion Into the Service Sector (Manuscripts)
2004
Comparisons of Performances Between Online Learners and Offline Learners Across Different Types of Tests (Report) Comparisons of Performances Between Online Learners and Offline Learners Across Different Types of Tests (Report)
2008