Hacking the Defense Innovation Ecosystem Enterprise: A Comparative Analysis - Highlighting Non-traditional Acquisition Authorities, Acting Entrepreneurially To Disrupt Status-Quo Bureaucracies

This excellent report has been professionally converted for accurate flowing-text e-book format reproduction. Secretary Mattis' 2018 National Defense Strategy acknowledges that the Department of Defense's (DoD's) asymmetric technological capabilities, which enable a decisive military advantage over U.S. adversaries, are steadily eroding. Implementing underutilized traditional and non-traditional acquisition authorities to navigate the innovation ecosystem may prove to be a fast, flexible solution to this technological innovation gap. We comparatively analyze the DoD's innovation ecosystem to understand the communities that make up the ecosystem and how they apply various acquisition authorities, techniques, or processes to accelerate future capabilities to the warfighter, and across the Defense Acquisition System.
Our research shows that traditional and non-traditional micro-ecosystems play pivotal roles in the transition of cutting-edge technology through government, industry, and academic collaboration. Aside from traditional authorities, we highlight several non-traditional acquisition authorities with potential for broader adoption across the enterprise. Finally, we discuss lessons learned in terms of "what," "where," "when," and "how" mid-level management decision makers can think and act entrepreneurially to positively disrupt status-quo bureaucracies that inhibit rapid innovation across the ecosystem.

This compilation includes a reproduction of the 2019 Worldwide Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community.

I. Introduction * A. Background * B. Purpose Statement * C. Research Objectives And Questions * D. Research Scope And Limitations * E. Methodology * F. Organization Of Report * G. Summary * II. Literature Review * A. The Defense Innovation Initiative: Origins And Importance * 1. Innovation Defined * 2. DoD's Perspective * 3. Industry's Perspective * B. Traditional Innovation Ecosystem * 1. Key Players * 2. Acquisition Authorities Leveraged * C. Non-Traditional Innovation Ecosystem * 1. Key Players * 2. Acquisition Authorities Leveraged * D. Summary * III. Methodology * A. Data Collection * B. Summary * IV. Findings * A. The Innovation Ecosystem * 1. Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs) * 2. University Academia * 3. DoD Research Labs * 4. Non-profit Innovation Institutes * 5. Small Business Administration Programs * 6. Non-traditional Industry * B. Acquiring Innovation: Positive Disruptioneering * 1. ARL Open Campus Initiative * 2. BMNT Innovation Pipeline * 3. Office of Naval Research Naval Innovation Process Adoption (NIPA) * 4. DIU OTA CSO Process * C. Lessons Learned * D. Summary * E. Future Research Considerations