05/01/92 State Idaho V. Michael Peightal

The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction for the manufacture of marijuana in violation of I.C. § 37-2732(a), entered pursuant to a conditional plea of guilty in accordance with I.C.R. 11. The defendant argues that the trial court erred by refusing to grant the defendant's motion to suppress evidence -- including 482 growing marijuana plants seized pursuant to a search warrant. The only issue raised on this appeal is whether the trial court correctly ruled that the defendant failed to show that the police supplied false information knowingly and intentionally or with reckless disregard for the truth in order to  obtain the search warrant. We hold that there was substantial and competent evidence to support the trial court's findings and Conclusions, and affirm the trial court's denial of the defendant's motion to suppress.