A Tale of Two Studies: Ethics, Bioterrorism, And the Censorship of Science.
The Hastings Center Report 2007, May-June, 37, 3
-
- 2,99 €
-
- 2,99 €
Beschreibung des Verlags
Some scientific research should not be published. The risks to national security and public health override the social benefits of disseminating scientific results openly. Unfortunately, scientists themselves are not in a position to know which studies to withhold from public view, as the National Research Council has proposed. Yet neither can government alone be trusted to balance the competing interests at stake. "How and why is it that I do not describe my method for remaining underwater and how long I can remain there without coming up for air? I do not wish to divulge or publish this because of the evil nature of men, who might use it for murder on the sea-bed." (1)
"Nanoethics"? What's New?
2007
"Are Their Babies Different from Ours?" Dutch Culture and the Groningen Protocol (Letters)
2008
The Ethics of Synthetic Biology: Guiding Principles for Emerging Technologies (Essays)
2011
Extreme Prematurity and Parental Rights After Baby Doe: The Child Abuse Amendments of 1984 Established the Norms for Treating Disabled Newborns, But They Did Not Address the Treatment of Premature Babies. Parents and Physicians Need a Framework for Decisionmaking. A Decision Handed Down Recently by the Texas Supreme Court is a Step Forward.
2004
The Ashley Treatment: Best Interests, Convenience, And Parental Decision-Making (Essay)
2007
Therapeutic Misconception in the Ethics of Clinical Trials. (A Critique of Clinical Equipoise) (Hypericum Depression Trial Study Group, 2002)
2003