Abelsen v. Abelsen

and urge that the court, in its opinion, erred in holding that: The court necessarily acquires jurisdiction through the allegations of the petition. It is argued that: There is a presumption of jurisdiction which attaches to courts of general jurisdiction. Counsel cites 1 Am.Jur. § 33, 636, and 1 Am.Jur. § 34, 637, and In re Grazzinis Estate, 31 Cal.App.2d 168, 87 P.2d 713.