![Ag v. Blum](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Ag v. Blum](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Ag v. Blum
70 S.W.3D 184, 2001.TX.0008121
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Beschreibung des Verlags
Lonza AG appeals an interlocutory order denying its special appearance to contest personal jurisdiction. We find insufficient contacts with the State of Texas to assert general jurisdiction over the Swiss corporation, and the extension of long arm jurisdiction under the circumstances presented here would not comport with our traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. Therefore, the order denying Lonza AGs motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is reversed and Lonza AG is dismissed from the suit.