Albert L. Desrosiers v. Dionne Bros. Albert L. Desrosiers v. Dionne Bros.

Albert L. Desrosiers v. Dionne Bros‪.‬

1952.NH.72, 92 A.2D 916, 97 N.H. 525

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Beschreibung des Verlags

Section 19 of the Workmens Compensation Act (Laws 1947, c. 266) provides in part that "during the first ninety days after an injury to an employee, an employer... shall furnish to an injured employee... reasonable medical and hospital services." The question raised by the plaintiff in connection with this section is whether the date of commencement of the ninety day period, described as following "after an injury", is the date when the injury occurs or the date it has become apparent and requires medical or hospital treatment. The plaintiff, in support of the latter view, relies chiefly upon the case of Millspaugh & Irish Co. v. Lunte, 82 Ind. App. 143, and other cases from that state in which the Indiana statute is construed.

GENRE
Gewerbe und Technik
ERSCHIENEN
1952
2. Dezember
SPRACHE
EN
Englisch
UMFANG
8
Seiten
VERLAG
LawApp Publishers
GRÖSSE
60,4
 kB

Mehr Bücher von Court of Appeals of New York

Matter Harold Robbins Et Al. v. Joseph Schechter Matter Harold Robbins Et Al. v. Joseph Schechter
1958
Church Scientology New York v. State New York Et Al. Church Scientology New York v. State New York Et Al.
1979
Steven D. Johnson v. Yeshiva University Et Al. Steven D. Johnson v. Yeshiva University Et Al.
1977
Hugh Morgan v. Aristotle S. Onassis Hugh Morgan v. Aristotle S. Onassis
1958
People State New York v. Betty Jane Marincic and Sharon Dorothy Smith People State New York v. Betty Jane Marincic and Sharon Dorothy Smith
1957
Incorporated Village Nyack v. Daytop Village Incorporated Village Nyack v. Daytop Village
1991