![Albert Vander Veer v. Continental Casualty Company](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Albert Vander Veer v. Continental Casualty Company](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Albert Vander Veer v. Continental Casualty Company
1974.NY.41735 312 N.E.2D 156; 34 N.Y.2D 50
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Beschreibung des Verlags
[12] In his application for group accident and health insurance, made on January 27, 1963, plaintiff stated that to the best of his knowledge, he was in good health and free from any physical impairment or disorder. In response to a question whether he had had any medical advice or treatment for certain specified disorders or conditions, including any disorder of the cardiovascular system, plaintiff listed five separate occasions on which he had received treatment for various disorders referred to in the question. [34 N.Y.2d 50 Page 52]
Mehr Bücher von Court of Appeals of New York
Matter Harold Robbins Et Al. v. Joseph Schechter
1958
Church Scientology New York v. State New York Et Al.
1979
Steven D. Johnson v. Yeshiva University Et Al.
1977
Hugh Morgan v. Aristotle S. Onassis
1958
People State New York v. Betty Jane Marincic and Sharon Dorothy Smith
1957
Incorporated Village Nyack v. Daytop Village
1991