![Alex G. Mcknight v. City Duluth.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Alex G. Mcknight v. City Duluth.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Alex G. Mcknight v. City Duluth.
1930.MN.363, 232 N.W. 795, 181 MINN. 450
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Beschreibung des Verlags
2. It was not error to receive in evidence photographs offered and received for the limited purpose of showing width of street and location of objects at the place of the accident which had remained unchanged, although some of the photographs incidentally showed a guard constructed since the accident. The charge of the court properly limited the consideration and effect to be given to such evidence by the jury and prevented prejudice.