Alexander v. Rogers

A jury found Harold Rogers should be sole managing conservator and Shannon Alexander should be possessory conservator of the parties two children. The trial court entered the jurys findings in the final divorce decree. On appeal, Alexander asserts in two issues that the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support the jurys finding Rogers should be appointed sole managing conservator because she presented credible evidence of a history or pattern of physical abuse by Rogers against a spouse and Rogers failed to rebut the statutory presumption in section 153.004(b) of the family code that naming him sole managing conservator was not in the best interest of the children. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.