Alfred Toker v. Harry R. Pollak
1978.NY.41717 376 N.E.2D 163; 44 N.Y.2D 211
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Beschreibung des Verlags
The principal issue before us is whether allegedly defamatory oral statements made by the defendant to a District Attorney concerning the possible commission of a crime by the plaintiff, as well as statements made in an affidavit submitted to the District Attorney by the defendant in lieu of an appearance before the Grand Jury are, in an action for libel and slander, protected by an absolute or a qualified privilege.
Mehr Bücher von Court of Appeals of New York
Matter Harold Robbins Et Al. v. Joseph Schechter
1958
Church Scientology New York v. State New York Et Al.
1979
Steven D. Johnson v. Yeshiva University Et Al.
1977
Hugh Morgan v. Aristotle S. Onassis
1958
People State New York v. Betty Jane Marincic and Sharon Dorothy Smith
1957
Incorporated Village Nyack v. Daytop Village
1991