Baubles & Beads v. Louis Vuitton Baubles & Beads v. Louis Vuitton

Baubles & Beads v. Louis Vuitton

1989.TX.40246; 766 S.W.2D 377

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

Baubles & Beads, a partnership, and Deborah Hyche, an employee of Baubles & Beads, appeal from an adverse summary judgment. Baubles & Beads and Hyche sued Louis Vuitton S.A.; Reboul, MacMurray, Hewitt, Maynard, & Kristol, a law firm representing Louis Vuitton; and attorneys Robert Devlin and Bruce Lederman, seeking to recover damages on the following causes of action: (1) abuse of process, (2) libel per se, and (3) slander per se. The trial court granted a summary judgment that they take nothing by virtue of their actions.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1989
22 February
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
9
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
60
KB

More Books by Supreme Court Of Utah

State Utah v. Theodore Robert Bundy State Utah v. Theodore Robert Bundy
1978
Byron K. Varme v. Leonard Gordon and Gfta Trendanalysen B.G.A. Herrdum Gmbh & Company Byron K. Varme v. Leonard Gordon and Gfta Trendanalysen B.G.A. Herrdum Gmbh & Company
1994
State v. Fedder Et Al. State v. Fedder Et Al.
1953
Benny Fatt v. Utah State Tax Commission Benny Fatt v. Utah State Tax Commission
1994
Emerald Oil Co. v. State Tax Commission Emerald Oil Co. v. State Tax Commission
1954
Dillon Smith v. Utah Central Credit Union Dillon Smith v. Utah Central Credit Union
1986