Cameron v. Cameron

This is an appeal from an order modifying a child support obligation. In eight points of error, appellant Garnet Gordon Cameron, representing himself on appeal, generally contends the trial court erred in failing to make a fact finding with respect to his ex-wifes net monthly resources as required by the Texas Family Code; awarding support at variance with the child support guidelines; ordering him to pay appellee additional amounts to cover the cost of his childs health insurance through her employer and one-half of the childs day care expenses; and ordering child support that does not permit him to pay his necessary living expenses. Concluding appellants points of error lack merit, we affirm the trial courts judgment.