Carey v. Musladin
127 S.CT. 649, 549 U.S. 70, 166 L.ED.2D 482, 75 USLW 4019, 06 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 11,315, 2006.SCT.0000193
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Beschreibung des Verlags
This Court has recognized that certain courtroom practices are so inherently prejudicial that they deprive the defendant of a fair trial. Estelle v. Williams, 425 U. S. 501, 503-506 (1976); Holbrook v. Flynn, 475 U. S. 560, 568 (1986). In this case, a state court held that buttons displaying the victims image worn by the victims family during respondents trial did not deny respondent his right to a fair trial. We must decide whether that holding was contrary to or an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law, as determined by this Court. 28 U. S. C. §2254(d)(1). We hold that it was not.
Mehr Bücher von Supreme Court of the United States
Motion Picture Patents Company v. Universal Film Manufacturing Company Et Al.
1917
Wilkinson V. Dotson
2005
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 3/3
2024
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 1/3
2024
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 2/3
2024
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 18 Crimes And Criminal Procedure Volume 2/2
2024