Carey v. Musladin Carey v. Musladin

Carey v. Musladin

127 S.CT. 649, 549 U.S. 70, 166 L.ED.2D 482, 75 USLW 4019, 06 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 11,315, 2006.SCT.0000193

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Beschreibung des Verlags

This Court has recognized that certain courtroom practices are so inherently prejudicial that they deprive the defendant of a fair trial. Estelle v. Williams, 425 U. S. 501, 503-506 (1976); Holbrook v. Flynn, 475 U. S. 560, 568 (1986). In this case, a state court held that buttons displaying the victims image worn by the victims family during respondents trial did not deny respondent his right to a fair trial. We must decide whether that holding was contrary to or an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law, as determined by this Court. 28 U. S. C. §2254(d)(1). We hold that it was not.

GENRE
Gewerbe und Technik
ERSCHIENEN
2006
11. Dezember
SPRACHE
EN
Englisch
UMFANG
17
Seiten
VERLAG
LawApp Publishers
GRÖSSE
66,2
 kB

Mehr Bücher von Supreme Court of the United States

Motion Picture Patents Company v. Universal Film Manufacturing Company Et Al. Motion Picture Patents Company v. Universal Film Manufacturing Company Et Al.
1917
Wilkinson V. Dotson Wilkinson V. Dotson
2005
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 3/3 United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 3/3
2024
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 1/3 United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 1/3
2024
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 2/3 United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 2/3
2024
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 18 Crimes And Criminal Procedure Volume 2/2 United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 18 Crimes And Criminal Procedure Volume 2/2
2024