Carl Bruce Wiese v. Christine M. Wiese Carl Bruce Wiese v. Christine M. Wiese

Carl Bruce Wiese v. Christine M. Wiese

1985.UT.29, 699 P.2D 700

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Beschreibung des Verlags

Our standard of review in divorce proceedings allows us to disturb the action of the trial court only when the evidence clearly preponderates to the contrary or the trial court has abused its discretion or misapplied principles of law. Lord v. Shaw, Utah, 682 P.2d 853 (1984); Fletcher v. Fletcher, Utah, 615 P.2d 1218, 1222 (1980). Subject to those limitations, we are free to review both the facts and the law. Openshaw v. Openshaw, Utah, 639 P.2d 177, 178 (1981); Christensen v. Christensen, Utah, 628 P.2d 1297 (1981).

GENRE
Gewerbe und Technik
ERSCHIENEN
1985
7. März
SPRACHE
EN
Englisch
UMFANG
17
Seiten
VERLAG
LawApp Publishers
GRÖSSE
66,1
 kB

Mehr Bücher von Supreme Court Of Utah

State Utah v. Theodore Robert Bundy State Utah v. Theodore Robert Bundy
1978
Byron K. Varme v. Leonard Gordon and Gfta Trendanalysen B.G.A. Herrdum Gmbh & Company Byron K. Varme v. Leonard Gordon and Gfta Trendanalysen B.G.A. Herrdum Gmbh & Company
1994
State v. Fedder Et Al. State v. Fedder Et Al.
1953
Baubles & Beads v. Louis Vuitton Baubles & Beads v. Louis Vuitton
1989
Benny Fatt v. Utah State Tax Commission Benny Fatt v. Utah State Tax Commission
1994
Emerald Oil Co. v. State Tax Commission Emerald Oil Co. v. State Tax Commission
1954