Carl Fust and Rita Fust v. Attorney Carl Fust and Rita Fust v. Attorney

Carl Fust and Rita Fust v. Attorney

MO.22376 , 947 S.W.2d 424 (1997)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Beschreibung des Verlags

en banc Carl and Rita Fust are judgment creditors. They were awarded $330,000 in punitive damages in a malicious prosecution action in 1994. This judgment was affirmed on appeal. Fust v. Francois, 913 S.W.2d 38 (Mo. App. 1995). Here, the Fusts seek a declaratory judgment that sec. 537.675 1, enacted as part of House Bill 700, Laws of 1987, p. 545, et seq. (HB 700), is unconstitutional. That section provides that 50% of any punitive damages judgment is deemed rendered in favor of the State of Missouri. The Circuit Court of Cole County found the statute constitutional. This Court has jurisdiction of the appeal. Mo. Const. art. V sec. 3. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. I.

GENRE
Gewerbe und Technik
ERSCHIENEN
1997
17. Juni
SPRACHE
EN
Englisch
UMFANG
16
Seiten
VERLAG
LawApp Publishers
GRÖSSE
63,7
 kB

Mehr Bücher von Supreme Court of Missouri

Hattie Arnold v. John H. Edelman and T Hattie Arnold v. John H. Edelman and T
1965
State Missouri v. Edgar Lee Howe State Missouri v. Edgar Lee Howe
1961
John P. Thompson v. Committee on John P. Thompson v. Committee on
1996
Frieda Leslie v. William Leslie Frieda Leslie v. William Leslie
1992
Cheryl Jean Easter v. Margaret Ochs Cheryl Jean Easter v. Margaret Ochs
1992
State Missouri v. Lee Mechanical State Missouri v. Lee Mechanical
1997