Carter v. America Online
208 F.SUPP.2D 1271, 2001.MFL.0000052
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Beschreibung des Verlags
The basic facts of this case are simple, although disputed. Counterdefendants were involved in purchasing insurance and insurance brokerage services from counterclaimants on behalf of a number of projects. Counterdefendants claim that they were secretly overcharged. Counterclaimants have a different story, namely that counterdefendants agreed to the extra charges and that counterdefendants used the extra charges to defraud HUD and the project owners.