Declaire v. G&B Mcintosh Family Limited Partnership

Appellant, Chris DeClaire, appeals the trial courts judgment that found in favor of appellee, G&B McIntosh Family Limited Partnership ("Partnership"). In 13 issues, DeClaire argues that the trial courts findings of fact and conclusions of law are erroneous because (1) the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to establish fraud; (2) the parol evidence rule and the merger doctrine bar the admission of evidence concerning an oral agreement; (3) the judgment creates a usurious transaction; and (4) the trial court erred in awarding attorneys fees, interest, and costs.