F.B. V. State

We review F.B. v. State, 816 So. 2d 699 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), which certified conflict with T.E.J. v. State, 749 So. 2d 557 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. As explained below, we approve the Fourth District Court of Appeal's holding that the insufficiency of the evidence to prove one element of a crime does not constitute fundamental error, and therefore this claim must first be raised in the trial court to be preserved for appellate review.