F. I. Dupont v. William S. Chen Et Al.
NY.43434; 364 N.E.2d 1115; 41 N.Y.2d 794 (1977)
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Beschreibung des Verlags
[41 N.Y.2d 794 Page 795] We conclude that, in at least some circumstances, an apartment house doorman may be a person of suitable age and discretion at the actual * * * dwelling place of a tenant in the apartment house to whom a summons may properly be delivered for the purposes of alternative service under CPLR 308 (subd 2).
Mehr Bücher von Court of Appeals of New York
Matter Harold Robbins Et Al. v. Joseph Schechter
1958
Church Scientology New York v. State New York Et Al.
1979
Steven D. Johnson v. Yeshiva University Et Al.
1977
Hugh Morgan v. Aristotle S. Onassis
1958
People State New York v. Betty Jane Marincic and Sharon Dorothy Smith
1957
Incorporated Village Nyack v. Daytop Village
1991