![Fancher v. Brunger](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Fancher v. Brunger](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Fancher v. Brunger
1949.CA.40061 94 CAL. APP. 2D 727; 211 P.2D 633
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Beschreibung des Verlags
Appellant Pollum, a chiropractor, and one Dr. Kirk were jointly indicted for four offenses of abortion, three of the subjects being married women and the fourth a single woman. Appellant was tried separately to a jury and was convicted on all counts. He was denied probation and sentenced to state prison. He appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. Four grounds of appeal are urged: (1) Insufficiency of the evidence as to each count; (2) error in admission as exhibits of certain surgical instruments; (3) error in the receipt of testimony of a physician as to alleged customary medical practices; (4) prejudicial argument of the prosecutor with respect to appellants failure to testify.