Farmer v. Litscher Farmer v. Litscher

Farmer v. Litscher

303 F.3D 840, 2002.C07.0000465

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Beschreibung des Verlags

The appellants are state prisoners who petitioned the district court pro se for writs of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. By consent of the parties, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the district court referred both cases for all proceedings to Magistrate Judge Goodstein, who denied the petitions and refused to issue certificates of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1). The appellants now seek certificates from us. We consolidated the cases and directed counsel to brief the following question: does a magistrate judge acting with the parties consent have the authority under § 636(c) to issue a final judgment in a § 2254 proceeding?

GENRE
Gewerbe und Technik
ERSCHIENEN
2002
18. September
SPRACHE
EN
Englisch
UMFANG
13
Seiten
VERLAG
LawApp Publishers
GRÖSSE
57,1
 kB

Mehr Bücher von Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals

Witzel v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Witzel v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
2000
United States v. Randle United States v. Randle
2003
United States v. Luckett United States v. Luckett
1995
Gadson v. Bop Warden Class of Chicago M.C.C Gadson v. Bop Warden Class of Chicago M.C.C
1995
Hart v. Schering-Plough Corporation Hart v. Schering-Plough Corporation
2001
In re Dorner In re Dorner
2003