![Farmers Bank v. Michael T. Brown Distributors Inc.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Farmers Bank v. Michael T. Brown Distributors Inc.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Farmers Bank v. Michael T. Brown Distributors Inc.
NC.40989; 291 S.E.2d 317; 57 N.C. App. 313 (1982)
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Beschreibung des Verlags
The defendants first contend that the trial court erred in ruling that the contract between defendants Pell and Needham and plaintiff Bank did not include a condition precedent to the guaranty that the plaintiff must first obtain the valid signatures of all the other named defendants before the guaranty would be effective. We agree with plaintiff.