Farr Man & Co. v. Rozita Farr Man & Co. v. Rozita

Farr Man & Co. v. Rozita

1990.C01.40417 903 F.2D 871

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Beschreibung des Verlags

Farr Man & Co., Inc., Farr Man International, Inc., Pine Street Trading Corporation, Sugar Chartering, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Farr Man") and Woodhouse, Drake and Carey ("Woodhouse") filed the instant action for cargo damage against the M/V ROZITA, in rem, as well as in personam against its owners and managers, Pescadore Maritime, Inc. and Universal Globe, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as "M/V ROZITA"), on December 27, 1985. The Amstar Corporation ("Amstar"), in its capacity as the cargo purchaser, was permitted to enter the action as an intervening plaintiff, and Lloyds Underwriters ("Lloyds") was later added as a party plaintiff pursuant to Farr Man/Woodhouses motion. The litigation essentially revolved around the issue of the proper allocation of responsibility and liability for cargo damage.

GENRE
Gewerbe und Technik
ERSCHIENEN
1990
22. Mai
SPRACHE
EN
Englisch
UMFANG
23
Seiten
VERLAG
LawApp Publishers
GRÖSSE
67,5
 kB

Mehr Bücher von United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Ponta-Garca v. Ashcroft Ponta-Garca v. Ashcroft
2004
In re Colarusso In re Colarusso
2004
Mihaylov v. Ashcroft Mihaylov v. Ashcroft
2004
Anderson v. City of Boston Anderson v. City of Boston
2004
Fit Tech, Inc. v. Bally Total Fitness Holding Corporation Fit Tech, Inc. v. Bally Total Fitness Holding Corporation
2004
Neuhoff v. Marvin Lumber and Cedar Co. Neuhoff v. Marvin Lumber and Cedar Co.
2004