![Fashion Page v. Zurich Insurance Company Et Al.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Fashion Page v. Zurich Insurance Company Et Al.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Fashion Page v. Zurich Insurance Company Et Al.
1980.NY.42248 406 N.E.2D 747; 50 N.Y.2D 265
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Beschreibung des Verlags
The question in this case is whether a corporation was properly served pursuant to CPLR 311 (subd 1) when the process server delivered the summons to the vice-presidents secretary, who had been identified by the defendants receptionist and the secretary herself as a person authorized to accept service for the corporation. The Supreme Court held that under the circumstances the service was valid. The Appellate Division affirmed and granted the defendant leave to appeal to this court on a certified question as to the correctness of the Supreme Courts determination.
Mehr ähnliche Bücher
Mehr Bücher von Court of Appeals of New York
Matter Harold Robbins Et Al. v. Joseph Schechter
1958
Church Scientology New York v. State New York Et Al.
1979
Steven D. Johnson v. Yeshiva University Et Al.
1977
Hugh Morgan v. Aristotle S. Onassis
1958
People State New York v. Betty Jane Marincic and Sharon Dorothy Smith
1957
Incorporated Village Nyack v. Daytop Village
1991