![Fay v. Noia](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Fay v. Noia](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Fay v. Noia
83 S. CT. 822, 372 U.S. 391, 9 L. ED. 2D 837, 1963.SCT.40503
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Beschreibung des Verlags
This case presents important questions touching the federal habeas corpus jurisdiction, 28 U. S. C. ?? 2241 et seq., in its relation to state criminal justice. The narrow question is whether the respondent Noia may be granted federal habeas corpus relief from imprisonment under a New York conviction now admitted by the State to rest upon a confession obtained from him in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, after he was denied state post-conviction relief because the coerced confession claim had been decided against him at the trial and Noia had allowed the time for a direct appeal to lapse without seeking review by a state appellate court.
Mehr Bücher von Supreme Court of the United States
Motion Picture Patents Company v. Universal Film Manufacturing Company Et Al.
1917
Wilkinson V. Dotson
2005
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 3/3
2024
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 1/3
2024
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 2/3
2024
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 18 Crimes And Criminal Procedure Volume 2/2
2024