![Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Herald Square Fabrics Corp. Et Al.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Herald Square Fabrics Corp. Et Al.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Herald Square Fabrics Corp. Et Al.
1981.NY.43332 439 N.Y.S.2D 944; 81 A.D.2D 168
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Beschreibung des Verlags
Three primary issues are raised on this appeal. The first concerns the formal requisites for the enforceability of a contract for the sale of chattel paper. The second involves the authority of a court, on a motion for summary judgment, to interpret a printed contract when there appears on its face a blank space. The third requires the statutory construction of the term "commercial reasonableness", in the context of section 9-504 of the Uniform Commercial Code, and specifically poses the following question: when there has been a postdefault disposition of collateral by a secured creditor, to what extent or degree will a discrepancy between the collaterals original sale price and its disposal price be sufficient to raise an issue of fact for trial, and thus defeat a motion for summary judgment?