Fitzpatrick v. City of Atlanta Fitzpatrick v. City of Atlanta

Fitzpatrick v. City of Atlanta

2 F.3d 1112, 2 A.D. Cases 1270, 62 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1484, 62 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42, 554, C11.40621(1993)

    • 0,49 €
    • 0,49 €

Beschreibung des Verlags

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: This suit was brought against the City of Atlanta (""the City"") by several African-American firefighters employed by the Atlanta Department of Public Safety, Bureau of Fire Services (""the Fire Department"") who suffer from a medical condition on account of which they cannot shave their faces. Plaintiffs challenge a fire department regulation that requires all firefighters to be clean-shaven. They allege (1) that this ""no-beard"" rule has a discriminatory disparate impact on African-Americans in violation of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. ? 2000e et seq.; (2) that the no-beard rule was adopted for racially discriminatory reasons in violation of Title VII; (3) that the rule discriminates against the handicapped in violation of ? 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. ? 794(a); and (4) that the rule infringes the firefighters' constitutional right to substantive due process of law.1 The City defends the policy, contending that the respirator masks used by firefighters cannot safely be worn by bearded men. The district court granted summary judgment for the City and the firefighters have appealed. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

GENRE
Gewerbe und Technik
ERSCHIENEN
1993
27. September
SPRACHE
EN
Englisch
UMFANG
44
Seiten
VERLAG
LawApp Publishers
GRÖSSE
84,2
 kB

Mehr Bücher von Eleventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals

Delta Air Lines Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Association Delta Air Lines Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Association
1988
Davis v. Great Western Bank Davis v. Great Western Bank
1993
Wiley v. Thomas Wiley v. Thomas
1993
Arlook v. Lichtenberg Arlook v. Lichtenberg
1992
Cumberland Memorial Gardens v. Roberts Cumberland Memorial Gardens v. Roberts
1992
In re a & B Heating & Air Conditioning Inc. In re a & B Heating & Air Conditioning Inc.
1989