Francois v. Goel
119 Cal.App.4th 425, Previously published at: 119 Cal.App.4th 425, 14 Cal.Rptr.3d 321, 2004.CA.0004453, 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7045, 21 IER Cases 745, Daily Op. Serv. 5170(4 Cal)
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Beschreibung des Verlags
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION - Opinion ordered published June 14, 2004 Plaintiffs, Philip Le Francois and Eric Herald sued their former employer, Duet Technologies, Inc. (Duet) 1 and three Duet officers, claiming that Duet had wrongfully withheld sales commissions and that the officers had made certain injurious misrepresentations and false promises. About a year after the litigation commenced, all defendants moved for summary judgment or in the alternative summary adjudication. The trial court denied the motion. A year after that, the individual defendants, Prabhu Goel, Anil Gupta, and Mark Goldman, filed a similar motion (the second motion) and a different trial court judge granted summary judgment as to them.
People v. Modiri
2003
In re Lowe
2005
Rodrigues v. Superior Court of Santa Clara County
2005
San Jose Mercury News, Inc. v. Criminal Grand Jury of Santa Clara County
2004
People v. Garza
2003
San Lorenzo Valley Community Advocates For Responsible Education v. San Lorenzo Valley Unified School Dist.
2006