Hennig v. Crosby Group Inc. Hennig v. Crosby Group Inc.

Hennig v. Crosby Group Inc‪.‬

1991.WA.40837 ; 802 P.2d 790; 116 Wash. 2d 131

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Beschreibung des Verlags

In the fall of 1983, the Port of Seattle engaged Hurlen Construction Company (the employer) to rehabilitate Pier 91 in Seattle. The construction company used a crane to replace old pilings at the pier via "pigeon holes" opened through the deck of the pier. A new piling would be lifted over the "pigeon hole" while a "pile buck" would position the 90-foot, 3,000-pound pile into place. After positioning the piling, the pile buck would signal the crane operator to let the pile fall into the sediment under the pier. The "pile buck" would step away when the pile was released.

GENRE
Gewerbe und Technik
ERSCHIENEN
1991
10. Januar
SPRACHE
EN
Englisch
UMFANG
4
Seiten
VERLAG
LawApp Publishers
GRÖSSE
57,1
 kB
In Re Personal Restraint of Earl Kenneth Shriner In Re Personal Restraint of Earl Kenneth Shriner
1981
American Dog Owners Association v. City of Yakima American Dog Owners Association v. City of Yakima
1989
Premo v. City of Renton Premo v. City of Renton
1994
Washington v. Dixon Washington v. Dixon
1994
Bronner v. Washington Bronner v. Washington
1994
Washington v. Silva-Baltazar Washington v. Silva-Baltazar
1994