In re Marriage of Goddard
90 P.3d 1209, 33 Cal.4th 49, 14 Cal.Rptr.3d 50, 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6686, 4 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4894, 04 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4894, CA.0004994(2004)
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Beschreibung des Verlags
A trial of an issue of fact in a civil matter may proceed in the absence of one of the parties and a default judgment may issue if the trial court is satisfied that that party ""had 15 days' notice of such trial."" (Code Civ. Proc., § 594, subd. (a).) If such notice was served by a party, Code of Civil Procedure section 594, subdivision (b) provides that proof of such notice of trial ""may be made by introduction into evidence of an affidavit or certificate . . . or other competent evidence."" In the present case, the husband in a marriage dissolution action did not appear for trial and a judgment was entered. The husband appealed, arguing that the notice of the trial date that had been served by opposing counsel had not been entered into evidence. The notice of trial had been filed, however, and was in the court file. The Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment, concluding the failure to introduce the notice into evidence was harmless error.