![Literary Theory and Marxist Criticism](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Literary Theory and Marxist Criticism](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Literary Theory and Marxist Criticism
-
- 18,99 €
-
- 18,99 €
Publisher Description
The Communist Partyís attitude toward art in this period was, in general, epiphenomenal of its economic policy. A resolution of 1925 voiced the partyís refusal to sanction anyoneís literary faction. This reflected the New Economic Policy (NEP) of a limited free-market economy. The period of the First Five-Year Plan (1928ñ1932) saw a more or less voluntary return to a more committed artistic posture, and during the second Five-Year Plan (1932ñ1936), this commitment was crystallized in the formation of a Writersí Union. The first congress of this union in 1934, featuring speeches by Maxim Gorky and Bukharin, officially adopted socialist realism, as defined primarily by Andrei Zhdanov (1896ñ1948). Aptly dubbed by Terry Eagleton as ìStalinís cultural thug,î it was Zhdanov whose proscriptive shadow thenceforward fell over Soviet cultural affairs. Although Nikolai Bukharinís speech at the congress had attempted a synthesis of Formalist and sociological attitudes, premised on his assertion that within ìthe microcosm of the word is embedded the macrocosm of history,î Bukharin was eventually to fall from his position as the leading theoretician of the party: his trial and execution, stemming from his political and economic differences with Stalin, were also symptomatic of the fact that Formalism soon became a sin once more. Bukharin had called for socialist realism to portray not reality ìas it isî but rather as it exists in socialist imagination.