Planning for an Influenza Pandemic: Social Justice and Disadvantaged Groups. Planning for an Influenza Pandemic: Social Justice and Disadvantaged Groups.

Planning for an Influenza Pandemic: Social Justice and Disadvantaged Groups‪.‬

The Hastings Center Report 2007, July-August, 37, 4

    • 2,99 €
    • 2,99 €

Beschreibung des Verlags

Because an influenza pandemic would create the most serious hardships for those who already face most serious hardships, countries should take special measures to mitigate the effect of a pandemic on existing social inequalities. Unfortunately, there is little evidence that anybody is thinking about that. **********

GENRE
Wissenschaft und Natur
ERSCHIENEN
2007
1. Juli
SPRACHE
EN
Englisch
UMFANG
21
Seiten
VERLAG
Hastings Center
GRÖSSE
188,5
 kB

Mehr ähnliche Bücher

Social Justice Is a Global Issue: Ethical Pandemic Planning (Letters) (Letter to the Editor) Social Justice Is a Global Issue: Ethical Pandemic Planning (Letters) (Letter to the Editor)
2008
Outbreaks, Epidemics, and Health Security Outbreaks, Epidemics, and Health Security
2022
Justice and the Human Development Approach to International Research (Cover Story) Justice and the Human Development Approach to International Research (Cover Story)
2005
Health and Development Health and Development
2002
Health And Sustainable Agricultural Development Health And Sustainable Agricultural Development
2019
Population and Strategies for National Sustainable Development Population and Strategies for National Sustainable Development
2020

Mehr Bücher von The Hastings Center Report

"Nanoethics"? What's New? "Nanoethics"? What's New?
2007
"Are Their Babies Different from Ours?" Dutch Culture and the Groningen Protocol (Letters) "Are Their Babies Different from Ours?" Dutch Culture and the Groningen Protocol (Letters)
2008
The Ethics of Synthetic Biology: Guiding Principles for Emerging Technologies (Essays) The Ethics of Synthetic Biology: Guiding Principles for Emerging Technologies (Essays)
2011
Extreme Prematurity and Parental Rights After Baby Doe: The Child Abuse Amendments of 1984 Established the Norms for Treating Disabled Newborns, But They Did Not Address the Treatment of Premature Babies. Parents and Physicians Need a Framework for Decisionmaking. A Decision Handed Down Recently by the Texas Supreme Court is a Step Forward. Extreme Prematurity and Parental Rights After Baby Doe: The Child Abuse Amendments of 1984 Established the Norms for Treating Disabled Newborns, But They Did Not Address the Treatment of Premature Babies. Parents and Physicians Need a Framework for Decisionmaking. A Decision Handed Down Recently by the Texas Supreme Court is a Step Forward.
2004
The Ashley Treatment: Best Interests, Convenience, And Parental Decision-Making (Essay) The Ashley Treatment: Best Interests, Convenience, And Parental Decision-Making (Essay)
2007
Therapeutic Misconception in the Ethics of Clinical Trials. (A Critique of Clinical Equipoise) (Hypericum Depression Trial Study Group, 2002) Therapeutic Misconception in the Ethics of Clinical Trials. (A Critique of Clinical Equipoise) (Hypericum Depression Trial Study Group, 2002)
2003