Taylor v. Solis Taylor v. Solis

Taylor v. Solis

571 F.3D 1313, 106 FAIR EMPL.PRAC.CAS. (BNA) 1121, 92 EMPL. PRAC. DEC. P 43,608, 2009.CDC.0000148

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Beschreibung des Verlags

Ruby Taylor, an African-American woman, sued her employer, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, claiming her supervisors sexually harassed her to the point of creating a hostile work environment and, when she complained, retaliated against her. The district court granted summary judgment to the Corporation because it concluded, as a matter of law, (1) the employer had an affirmative defense to Taylors claim of sexual harassment and, (2) with regard to retaliation, Taylor (a) had not offered a prima facie showing that her protected activity caused most of the alleged acts of retaliation, (b) had failed to show one such act was a materially adverse action, and (c) had failed to rebut the Corporations nondiscriminatory explanation of another. We affirm, holding as a matter of law that the PBGC has an affirmative defense to the claim of sexual harassment and that Taylor has failed to meet her burden regarding the claim of retaliation.

GENRE
Gewerbe und Technik
ERSCHIENEN
2009
10. Juli
SPRACHE
EN
Englisch
UMFANG
43
Seiten
VERLAG
LawApp Publishers
GRÖSSE
79,2
 kB

Mehr Bücher von Arizona Court of Appeals

Bee-Gee Inc. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security Bee-Gee Inc. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
1984
Church Of Scientology Of Arizona V. City Of Phoenix Police Department Church Of Scientology Of Arizona V. City Of Phoenix Police Department
1979
Hill Brothers Chemical Co. V. Grandinetti Hill Brothers Chemical Co. V. Grandinetti
1979
State v. Superior Court State v. Superior Court
1996
Fisher v. Kaufman Fisher v. Kaufman
2001
State v. Seyrafi State v. Seyrafi
2001