The Abuse of Property
-
- 12,99 €
-
- 12,99 €
Beschreibung des Verlags
A fundamental critique of the current property regime, calling for radical social and political change.
In The Abuse of Property, Daniel Loick offers a multifaceted philosophical critique of the concept of property, broadly understood. He argues that property should not be the dominant framework in which human beings regulate the use of things, that property is not the same as use. Property rights, in his view, are not conditions of freedom or justice, but deficient, dysfunctional, and harmful ways of interacting with other people and the natural environment. He dissects not only the classic justifications of property (from John Locke's justification of property as a natural right based on individual freedom to Hegel's justification of property as a form of mutual recognition) but also the classic critiques of property, from Proudhon and Marx up to Adorno and Agamben.
Through an innovative critical approach to legal studies, Loick demonstrates how the concept of property, historically applied to things and people and still a linchpin of our distorted relation with the world, forms a direct line from the Occupy movement to Black Lives Matter and beyond.
PUBLISHERS WEEKLY
Political philosopher Loick (Reinventing Critical Theory) critiques prevailing theories of property in this brief yet bustling treatise. He begins by tracing current notions about property to the philosophers John Locke and Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. For Locke, common property encompasses the entirety of the earth—but is transformed into private property through the expenditure of labor. Locke argued that the state can best protect individual liberty by protecting the right of the individual to ownership, and Hegel similarly hypothesized that private property was the necessary bedrock of interpersonal relations and civil society. According to Loick, these frameworks have resulted in an atomized, hyperindividual socioeconomic landscape where humans are forced to relate only to themselves, each other, and the planet in socially deforming, ecologically unsustainable, and economically exploitative ways. Although Loick's Marxian criticisms are well-founded, the proposed alternatives remain intriguing but underdeveloped. He suggests that a combination of Franciscan monastic poverty, Marxian economy, and feminist political philosophy can overcome the current entrenched systems of property. And while he uses file-sharing, pirating, Wikipedia, Creative Commons, 3D printing, open-source software, and squatting as examples of alternatives to private property, these hardly qualify as systemic alternatives. Though nuanced and stimulating, this falls short in its practical applications.
