[U] Haskins v. Farmers Home Administration [U] Haskins v. Farmers Home Administration

[U] Haskins v. Farmers Home Administration

87 F.3d 1319, 1996.C09.42377

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Beschreibung des Verlags

MEMORANDUM* Chapter 7 debtors Curtis and Mary Ann Haskins (""Haskinses"") appeal pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendants in their action alleging various constitutional and statutory violations arising from loans made by the Farmers Home Administration (""FmHA"") to the Haskinses. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. The Haskinses contend that the district court erred by granting summary judgment for defendants on the basis that the Haskinses lacked standing to bring their action against defendants. We review de novo a district court's determination that a party lacks standing to bring an action in federal court. See Bruce v. United States, 759 F.2d 755, 758 (9th Cir. 1985).

GENRE
Gewerbe und Technik
ERSCHIENEN
1996
19. Juni
SPRACHE
EN
Englisch
UMFANG
3
Seiten
VERLAG
LawApp Publishers
GRÖSSE
60,2
 kB

Mehr Bücher von Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals

Porsche Cars North America, Inc. v. Allporshe.Com Porsche Cars North America, Inc. v. Allporshe.Com
2000
United States v. Boone United States v. Boone
2000
[T][U] Hartman v. Mccarthy [T][U] Hartman v. Mccarthy
1996
[T][U] Butcher v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. [T][U] Butcher v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.
1996
[T][U] Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Castetter [T][U] Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Castetter
1996
[T][U] Likes v. Babbitt [T][U] Likes v. Babbitt
1996