Understanding Nato's Sustainability: The Limits of Institutionalist Theory (Report) Understanding Nato's Sustainability: The Limits of Institutionalist Theory (Report)

Understanding Nato's Sustainability: The Limits of Institutionalist Theory (Report‪)‬

Global Governance 2011, Jan-March, 17, 1

    • 2,99 €
    • 2,99 €

Publisher Description

Our assumption in this article is that sustainable peace operations require the involvement of organizations and institutions that are themselves sustainable. We begin by presenting a set of propositions regarding the sustainability of international institutions in which the capacity for adaptation and incremental change are centrally important. We then examine these propositions in relation to NATO, paying particular attention to the ways in which the alliance has taken on both new roles and new members. A central concern of the article is the ways in which NATO member states' conceptions of identity and definitions of national interest affect the sustainability of the alliance, and limit the ability of alliance members to generate the longer-term commitment needed for peace support operations. KEYWORDS: NATO, institutions, institutional change, sustainability, Afghanistan. THE NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION'S (NATO) MISSION IN AFGHANISTAN continues to dominate the headlines in many of those states whose forces are deployed to it. The escalation in violence in that country and sharp increase in attacks on coalition forces--combined with continued challenges in reaching a stable political settlement--have provoked anguished debates both within individual governments and among alliance members about the prospects for NATO's first engagement in sustained ground military operations. Such debates have been marked not only by soul-searching concerning the future of allied deployments, but also by increasingly bitter exchanges between allies regarding what many perceive to be the iniquitous division of the burden being carried by some member states. Indeed, commentators have been moved to suggest that burden sharing is an area in which NATO has been "spectacularly unsuccessful." (1) In response, NATO heads of state and government have been quick to insist that they would "support each other in sharing the burden in Afghanistan." (2)

GENRE
Politics & Current Affairs
RELEASED
2011
1 January
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
25
Pages
PUBLISHER
Lynne Rienner Publishers
SIZE
270.4
KB

More Books by Global Governance

Future Prospects for the United Nations (Irrelevant Or Indispensable? the United Nations in the 21st Century) (The Parliament of Man: The Past, Present, And Future of the United Nations) (The United Nations and Its Future in the 21st Century) (The United Nations, Peace and Security) (The United Nations: Confronting the Challenges of a Global Society) (Book Review) Future Prospects for the United Nations (Irrelevant Or Indispensable? the United Nations in the 21st Century) (The Parliament of Man: The Past, Present, And Future of the United Nations) (The United Nations and Its Future in the 21st Century) (The United Nations, Peace and Security) (The United Nations: Confronting the Challenges of a Global Society) (Book Review)
2007
International Norm Dynamics and the "End of Poverty": Understanding the Millennium Development Goals (Global Insights) (Report) International Norm Dynamics and the "End of Poverty": Understanding the Millennium Development Goals (Global Insights) (Report)
2011
The United Nations and Globalization: Patterns and Limits of Institutional Adaptation. The United Nations and Globalization: Patterns and Limits of Institutional Adaptation.
2003
The UN Intellectual History Project: Review of a Literature. The UN Intellectual History Project: Review of a Literature.
2006
The Global Compact: Shifting the Politics of International Development? The Global Compact: Shifting the Politics of International Development?
2006
International Law and the Entitlement to Democracy After war. International Law and the Entitlement to Democracy After war.
2003