![Zant v. Stephens](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Zant v. Stephens](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Zant v. Stephens
103 S. CT. 2733, 462 U.S. 862, 77 L. ED. 2D 235, 51 U.S.L.W. 4891, 1983.SCT.42560
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Beschreibung des Verlags
The question presented is whether respondents death penalty must be vacated because one of the three statutory aggravating circumstances found by the jury was subsequently held to be invalid by the Supreme Court of Georgia, although the other two aggravating circumstances were specifically upheld. The answer depends on the function of the jurys finding of an aggravating circumstance under Georgias capital sentencing statute, and on the reasons that the aggravating circumstance at issue in this particular case was found to be invalid.
Mehr Bücher von Supreme Court of the United States
Motion Picture Patents Company v. Universal Film Manufacturing Company Et Al.
1917
Wilkinson V. Dotson
2005
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 3/3
2024
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 1/3
2024
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 2/3
2024
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 18 Crimes And Criminal Procedure Volume 2/2
2024