![Zitterkopf v. Bradbury](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Zitterkopf v. Bradbury](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Zitterkopf v. Bradbury
783 P.2D 1142, 1989.WY.0000419
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Beschreibung des Verlags
Appellant Gary Zitterkopf, doing business as Superior Woods Construction, sued to recover $13,964.70 upon quantum meruit for remodeling the home of appellee Basil Bradbury. After a bench trial, the district court found that the $40,000 Bradbury had paid sufficiently compensated Zitterkopf for the work done. Zitterkopf frames the issues as follows:
Mehr Bücher von Supreme Court of the United States
Motion Picture Patents Company v. Universal Film Manufacturing Company Et Al.
1917
Wilkinson V. Dotson
2005
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 3/3
2024
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 1/3
2024
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 2/3
2024
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 18 Crimes And Criminal Procedure Volume 2/2
2024