![Carson v. Doggett](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Carson v. Doggett](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Carson v. Doggett
1950.NC.40256; 231 N.C. 629; 58 S.E.2D 609
-
- 4,00 kr
-
- 4,00 kr
Publisher Description
We think the evidence introduced in the trial below, when considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff, as it must be on motion for judgment as of nonsuit, is sufficient to withstand such motion. Potter v. Supply Co., 230 N.C. 1, 51 S.E.2d 908; Winfield v. Smith, 230 N.C. 392, 53 S.E.2d 251; Grier v. Phillips, 230 N.C. 672, 55 S.E.2d 485. Moreover, defendants evidence in conflict with the evidence of the plaintiff will not be considered on motion to nonsuit. Chesser v. McCall, 230 N.C. 119, 52 S.E.2d 231; Bundy v. Powell, 229 N.C. 707, 51 S.E.2d 307; Taylor v. Hodge, 229 N.C. 558, 50 S.E.2d 307.