![Einar Hamre v. andy Senger](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Einar Hamre v. andy Senger](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Einar Hamre v. andy Senger
1956.ND.65, 79 N.W.2D 41
-
- 4,00 kr
-
- 4,00 kr
Publisher Description
1. A motion to dismiss an appeal for lack of diligence in the prosecution thereof is addressed to the discretion of the court, and where it appears that the delay in the perfection of the record has not prejudiced the respondent, and it further appears that the appellant has cured any default that may have existed by filing the entire record in the supreme court before any objection was made by the respondent, the motion to dismiss the appeal will be denied.