![H.G. Shew and Ethel H. Shew v. Paul W. Kirby](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![H.G. Shew and Ethel H. Shew v. Paul W. Kirby](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
H.G. Shew and Ethel H. Shew v. Paul W. Kirby
1961.FL.41387 135 SO. 2D 770
-
- 4,00 kr
-
- 4,00 kr
Publisher Description
This appeal is brought from a summary final decree wherein the lower court held that appellants, defendants below, were barred from asserting their answer and counterclaim against plaintiff-appellee in this suit for injunctive relief since the subject matter contained in said answer and counterclaim was barred by the doctrines of res judicata and laches. The reformation of a deed, the necessity for which was raised in the answer and which was sought by the counterclaim, had previously been before the court between the same parties. Defendant-counterclaimant in the instant case was the plaintiff in the prior suit which was dismissed for failure to prosecute under § 45.19, F.S.A.