Hammack V. Monroe Street Lumber Co‪.‬

Appellant, plaintiff below, appeals from a judgment dismissing his action for damages resulting from a motor vehicle collision, but, because the sole issue concerns the effect of the repeal of the immunity proviso on prior injuries, Laws of 1939, chapter 41, § 2, p. 121, 123,*fn2 by Laws of 1957, chapter 70, § 23, p. 279, a detailed statement of the evidence is unnecessary. There was a prior appeal,