![James Gordon Gaskill v. Edith Montague and James F. Montague](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![James Gordon Gaskill v. Edith Montague and James F. Montague](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
James Gordon Gaskill v. Edith Montague and James F. Montague
FL.40409; 128 So. 2d 420 (1961)
-
- 4,00 kr
-
- 4,00 kr
Publisher Description
Per Curiam. In this action for damages for personal injuries a jury verdict rendered for the defendant was set aside and plaintiffs' motion for new trial was granted. No grounds were stated in the order, as they are required to be by § 59.07(4), Fla.Stat., F.S.A., and rule 2.6(d), F.R.C.P., 31 F.S.A. Defendant's appeal assigned as error the failure of the order granting new trial to state any grounds therefor. See Booker v. Saunders Realty Co., Fla.1951, 53 So.2d 912; Ebersole v. Tepperman, Fla.1953, 65 So.2d 564; Means v. Douglas, Fla.App.1959, 110 So.2d 88; Fulton v. Poston Bridge & Iron, Inc., Fla.App.1960, 122 So.2d 240.