James Heddons Sons v. American Fork & Hoe Co. James Heddons Sons v. American Fork & Hoe Co.

James Heddons Sons v. American Fork & Hoe Co‪.‬

1945.C06.40105 148 F.2D 230

    • 4,00 kr
    • 4,00 kr

Publisher Description

Some 30 or 35 years ago golf club manufacturers began substituting tubular steel shafts for the conventional hickory shafts in golf clubs. It was thought as disclosed by Knight in his patent No. 976,267, that hickory offered but small resistance to tortional strain, causing the club head to twist upon impact, and so to make the flight of the driven ball uncertain and irregular. Knight, among others, observed, the need of suppleness in a golf shaft to suit the taste of the individual player, some preferring it to be near the head and others near the middle of the shaft, the "feel" of the club dominating these preferences. He asserted that in a steel shaft the metal may be so distributed that suppleness can be achieved at any desired point.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1945
4 April
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
11
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
67.1
KB

More Books by Sixth Circuit Circuit Court Of Appeals

Gardner v. Grand Beach Co. Gardner v. Grand Beach Co.
1931
Wisconsin Land & Lumber Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Wisconsin Land & Lumber Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
1937
Pitcairn v. Brandes Pitcairn v. Brandes
1937
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Ross Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Ross
1936
United States v. Preslar United States v. Preslar
1936
Andrews v. Drake Andrews v. Drake
1936