Jane M. Carroll, Plaintiff in Error v. Lessee of George W. Carroll Jane M. Carroll, Plaintiff in Error v. Lessee of George W. Carroll

Jane M. Carroll, Plaintiff in Error v. Lessee of George W. Carroll

57 U.S. 275, 1853.SCT.0000095

    • 4,00 kr
    • 4,00 kr

Publisher Description

Verdict. Who being impanelled and sworn to say the truth in the premises, upon their oath do say, the defendant is guilty of the trespass and ejectment in the declaration mentioned upon the tracts of the land therein stated, called Black Walnut Thicket and Content, in manner and form as the said lessee, John Doe, complains against her, and which is contained within the metes and bounds, courses and distances, set out and described in the paper hereto annexed, and made for that purpose a part of this verdict, being a deed from Walter B. Brooke, of Prince George's county, and State of Maryland, Alexander Middleton and Elizabeth A. Middleton, his wife, of Charles county, and said State, to Michael B. Carrol, dated the 29th January, eighteen hundred and forty-two; and they assess the damages of said John Doe, lessee, by occasion of the trespass and ejectment aforesaid at one dollar; and as to the other trespasses and ejectment upon the other tracts or parcels of land in said declaration, also mentioned, they find that the said defendant is not guilty. (Then followed the deed.) Upon which verdict the court entered the following Judgment. Therefore it is considered by the court here, that the said lessee, as aforesaid, do recover against the said Jane M. Carroll his term aforesaid yet to come and unexpired, of and in the said tracts of land called 'Black Walnut Thicket' and 'Content,' with the appurtenances in the district aforesaid, wherein the said Jane M. Carroll is, by the jurors above, found to be guilty of the trespass and ejectment aforesaid; and the sum of one dollar his damages by the said jurors in manner aforesaid assessed; and also the sum of ________ by the court now here adjudged unto the said lessee for his costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf expended, and that he have thereof his execution, &c. The case was argued by Mr. Schley and Mr. Alexander, for the plaintiff in error, and by Mr. Nelson and Mr. Johnson, for the defendants in error.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1853
1 December
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
24
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
79
KB

More Books by United States Supreme Court

Hammond Et Al. v. Mason and Hamlin Organ Company Hammond Et Al. v. Mason and Hamlin Organ Company
1875
Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Annotated 2023 Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Annotated 2023
2023
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure Annotated 2023 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure Annotated 2023
2023
Federal Rules of Evidence Annotated 2023 Federal Rules of Evidence Annotated 2023
2023
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Annotated 2023 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Annotated 2023
2023
Federal Rules of Evidence, Criminal Procedure, Civil Procedure and Appellate Procedure 2023 Federal Rules of Evidence, Criminal Procedure, Civil Procedure and Appellate Procedure 2023
2023