![Keats v. United States](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Keats v. United States](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Keats v. United States
C06.40428; 865 F.2d 86 (1988)
-
- 4,00 kr
-
- 4,00 kr
Publisher Description
The plaintiff-appellant appeals from the district court's summary judgment order which disallowed his claims for tax refunds. 695 F. Supp. 353. The district court agreed with the Commissioner's conclusion that the plaintiff-appellant's commodity option straddle transactions were ""shams"" wholly lacking non-tax economic substance. Because we conclude that there was no genuine, material factual issue in this case, and that the Commissioner was entitled to judgment as a matter of law, we affirm the district court's judgment. I.