Keener V. Beal Keener V. Beal

Keener V. Beal

    • 4,00 kr
    • 4,00 kr

Publisher Description

The defendant offered evidence. He assigns as error the refusal of the court to allow his motion for judgment of nonsuit made at the close of all the evidence. G.S. 1-183; White v. Lacey, 245 N.C. 364, 96 S.E.2d 1. The defendant in his brief contends that plaintiff should have been nonsuited on the ground of contributory negligence, for the reason that plaintiff failed to keep a proper lookout, and "was operating his automobile in the nighttime with headlights which were markedly below the statutory standard." The defendant says in his brief he has not argued the absence of negligence on the part of the defendant, though "that clearly appears from the record." Defendant has selected contributory negligence as the ground upon which to wage battle.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1957
22 May
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
17
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
55.9
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of North Carolina

Solon Lodge No. 9 Knights Of Pythias Co. V. Ionic Lodge Free Ancient And Accepted Masons No. 72 Co. Solon Lodge No. 9 Knights Of Pythias Co. V. Ionic Lodge Free Ancient And Accepted Masons No. 72 Co.
1957
Branham v. Roll Branham v. Roll
1943
North Carolina v. Lawson North Carolina v. Lawson
1994
In re Appeal of Cone Mills Corp. In re Appeal of Cone Mills Corp.
1994
Lohr v. Lohr Lohr v. Lohr
1994
Pinnix v. City of High Point Pinnix v. City of High Point
1994